The PS industry, having gone unpunished for all of its evil activities in the past, continued with them, extended them, enlarged them. Indeed, they predictably adapted their techniques, notably their capacity to bias, distort, censor, confabulate, spin for the purpose of promotion, to wheel and deal,and to play on the fragile self image of women in American culture.

In particular, the PS industry directed their technology to solving the problem of their sudden income loss, and they succeeded with this wildly, so much so that now, with the breast implant business returned to its former business boom, their strategies have led to a full doubling of their business profits (annually, total industry, dollar values adjusted for inflation) over the former heights in 1992

Thus it came to pass that after 1992, the PS industry came to be supported by two major pillars, the breast implants operations and the breast reduction surgeries. Each of these branches tend to be equal and opposite. The breast reduction and the breast implant industry in America as a whole take white women as its primary demographic, its major population of profit and exploitation, and consequently its major dumping grounds of its pollutions.

Targeting of the white race in America for the PS industry is racist, a form of genicide, and the combined effects of the PS industry and the diet industry have initiated waves of iatrogenic illness and deformity in that group.The breast implant foundation of the PS industry is supported by the *entertainment industry* as its primary shills. The major demographic, or business target is thinnish women, a focus that makes full exploitation of the nature of female body fat and its association with breast size. The promotion of this branch works mainly thru providing examples, showcasing the glories of breast implants.

Mind you, the significant role that the US medical community has played in exploiting young undeveloped minds and bodies for profit represents only part of the total advances that doctors have made in achieving ongoing progress in the profits of breast reduction surgery in the US. Basically, the industry that promotes the breast reductions and facilitates their payment via the insurance companies is the the medical industry, which is a super set of the PS industry.

The PS industry was very quick at correcting for their breast surgery profit losses in 1991 by building up breast reduction as a major secondary source of income. Last decade, inspite of the two thirds reduction early on in breast implant profits, the’ total PS profits from breast surgery were not reduced at all, thanks to the speedy promotion of the breast reduction in the medical industry as well as media.

Since that time, both the profits from breast augmentation and the profits from breast reduction (which have tended to exceed breast implants profits) have continued to grow exponentially each year, and now, breast augmentation profits have somewhat exceeded what they were before their downfall, while breast reduction profits have kept pace and still exceed profits from breast implants.

Therefore, as the surgeons rake in money thru both the augmentations, which act upon all women who are smaller than a standard defined by PS authorities, and breast reductions, which apply to all women larger than the aesthetic ideals defined by the reverenced PS’s who are doctors and have the backing of doctors, the surgeons now make three times the annual breast alteration profits that they did just before their unfortunate incident with the silicone lawsuits. Hence, the PS industry has not only corrected the danger to its ongoing profits, but it has managed to use the incident of the silicone losses and turn it a situation that has made them richer than ever.

However, Medical insurance covers physical ailments. Low self esteem and poor body image are not physical ailments. I have seen doctors on TV talking about how many of the people who get plastic surgery do not get improved self esteem from the surgery (hence the need to screen patients). Self esteem and good body image are independent of actual physical appearance. A surgery on the outside is not going to fix the poor self esteem.

The person is already deriving too much of their self esteem from their appearance if they are willing to undergo surgery to correct some minor defect (not necessarily even a defect in the eyes of others). They could get their self esteem from career accomplishments or helping with charities instead of based on their looks. I do believe that most insurance companies do cover (as they should) reconstructive surgeries if people get burned or have cleft palate, etc. We do take care of our people, but we do not need to spoil them. Though I am not qualified to give advice on your situation, I know that there are a lot of qualified people who read this news group that can. It amazes me what the medical profession considers cosmetic surgery.

Dental and eyes are another example of what the insurance companies do not consider a part of your body when you hve problems. I will bet if a lot of insurance company board members wifes or daughters had your problem and pain, coverage would be changed. After feeling your pain it has made me think being a man, about how uncomfortable we can make a women feel when we dont focus on her eyes or what she is saying. Too many men, maybe including me will focus on well endowed womens chest, which really shows what jerks we can be. In our fantisies it we forget how hurt this woman may feel.