FDA
Panel Chair Opposes Silicone Breast Implants
Wed November 05, 2003 06:55 PM ET
By Lisa Richwine
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
- The chairman of a U.S. advisory panel that urged approval for
Inamed Corp.'s silicone gel breast implants last month has made
an unusual appeal to regulators to reject the company's application.
Dr. Thomas Whalen, in
a letter sent last Friday, said he had "very strong reservations"
about the panel's "misguided" 9-6 vote in favor of resuming silicone
gel implant sales. Whalen served as the panel's non-voting chairman.
Shares of California-based
Inamed fell $10.06, or 11.45 percent, to close at $77.79 on Nasdaq
on Wednesday after the letter became public.
The United States banned
silicone gel-filled breast implants for most women in 1992 amid
safety concerns.
In his letter to Food
and Drug Administration Commissioner Mark McClellan, Whalen said
he felt long-term safety questions remained. Breast implants frequently
rupture, and many women believe silicone leaking from the implants
can cause serious autoimmune diseases. No major studies have found
a connection. "Long-term
safety, the concern that prompted the removal from the market eleven
years ago, was clearly not demonstrated, and to approve this device
poses threats to women that are clearly unknown," wrote Whalen.
He is chief of pediatric surgery at the University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Whalen did
not vote at the committee meeting because the chair of device panels
only votes in the event of a tie.
His term on
the panel had expired in 2002 but he was asked to serve as acting
chairman for the October meeting. He said he does not expect to
serve on an FDA panel again.
"I regret that
the final chapter of my FDA experience was this one and implore
you ... not to approve this (application)," Whalen wrote to the
FDA.
In an interview
Wednesday, Whalen said he felt he had to remain "fair and impartial"
at the meeting as chairman. His "increasing discomfort" since the
panel meeting prompted him to voice his concerns in the letter,
he said.
Copies of Whalen's
letter were sent to five members of Congress.
The FDA usually
follows recommendations from its advisory panels, which are groups
of experts from outside the agency.
FDA spokeswoman
Kathleen Quinn said the agency was carefully reviewing Whalen's
letter. "It will be part of what we consider," she said.
Inamed, in
a written statement, said company officials "remain confident in
the FDA's science-based process and their thorough review of the
panel's recommendation."
At the panel
meeting, Inamed acknowledged its implants carried risks of rupture
and repeat operations but said most women in clinical trials were
happy with the devices. The company promised long-term monitoring
for potential complications, a safeguard panel members said was
essential if the implants were approved.
Thomas Gunderson,
an analyst for U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, said he felt Whalen's
expression of concern would delay the FDA's decision by two to four
months but that ultimately Inamed would win approval.
A delay could
give rival Mentor Corp. time to "catch up" to Inamed, Gunderson
said in a report. Mentor has said it will apply for approval of
silicone breast implants by year's end.
Shares of Mentor,
also based in California, gained 3 percent to close at $20.60.
Implants filled
with saline are widely available, but many women say silicone implants
provide a more natural look and feel.
|