Currently, the PS industry has a powerful ally in the medical industry. Unfortunately, in spite of the powerful propaganda, the decade long promotions, the information propagated by the PS and medical industry can be shown, on standard scientific peer review, to be scientifically groundless.
Furthermore, thanks to the publication of medical shill studies by PS affiliates, the pattern of misinformation and bias can be fully documented under review by psychologists, social scientists, and other individuals that have knowledge of the nature of propaganda techniques and other methods of information bias. This means that the entire PS developed, medically sponsored PS industry is built on a house of cards, regardless of how well entrenched it has become.
It is therefore quite logical that the legal responsibility for the iatrogenic damage caused by the breast reduction industry in the US should, justly, fall on the hands of the doctors who are responsible, not the insurance companies who were forced (by the system) to go along with this. Judging by history, it is quite possible that the PS/medical industry faction will attempt to render the insurance companies as a scapegoat so that they (PS) can be shielded from the consequences. Allowing this to happen would be a legal atrocity.
PS/medical industry sponsorship of this breast reduction money machine has already created major distortions in information, and has taken license to a degree that is virtually unprecedented. Allowing scapegoating to occur, as it did in 1991, will assure that the crimes of deception in the name of industrial profit will be further condoned by society, and will pave the way for the continued and greater growth of this variety of white collar, elitist led crime.
The insurance industry is susceptible to billions of dollars of lawsuits related to the topic of breast reduction. The class action suits would be brought by people who have had their claims denied so that priorities can be arranged to favor breast reduction surgeries. The sheer dollar value of claims that must be denied to coddle the medical industry promotion of breast reduction surgery is quite substantial, in as much that it exceeds the total current amount of private money that is given in the US for all breast augmentation surgeries.
Of great importance is the way the PS industry, now resting on equal and opposite foundation of breast reduction and breast implants, serves to fully exploit the natural diversity of female body fat. By targeting the thin women for breast implants and big women for breast reduction, the PS propaganda machine has a huge bested interest in matters of fat and female body image.
The following was released today by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: * In the aftermath of September 11, Americans will continue to reevaluate their priorities; some will focus on personal improvement and, perhaps for the first time, consider cosmetic surgery as an option. * New surgical and skin care techniques offering improved results for darker skin will increase cosmetic procedures among ethnic minorities in the U.S. *
Honestly, If I could afford it, I would get liposuction on my thighs and butt. They are not hideously out of proportion, but they are naturally heavy–even when I am very thin I have bigger legs. My butt and thighs are the focus of most of my body angst, and I always feel like if they were ok, it would be easier to let go of the eating disorder.
The kids themselves ranges from severely disabled to very mainstream-able(I have no idea what the proper way to say that these days). They also had the doctors who specialized in this and other reconstructive surgeries. The parents seemed all to be very comfortable with their special kids.
Although more and more men are undergoing cosmetic surgery, women remain its chief consumers. A face lift. A tummy tuck. A nose job. A breast enhancement. The terms sound so cozy, even if the actual procedures are anything but. Women have played an active role in encouraging the culture of cosmetic surgery, but of course women are under far more social pressure than men to look good.
‘Can plastic cosmetic surgery just be applied to everyone or only to a certain group of people? What group? Why?’ In order to do a talk of good quality, in have to collect the opinions of all people with different motives in this business. Could you be so kind to respond with a clear statement, provided from some good arguments?
The best plastic surgeries are the ones which are undetectable. Sophia Loren, Angela Lansbury, Julie Newmar and several other celebs have been under the knife but you wouldn’t necessarily know it unless you’ve seen before and after pictures. Especially in Angela Lansbury’s case–she looks like she had been away for a long restful vacation. She still looks like a 60-something year old grandmother, just one who’s taken really good care of herself. That woman in the New Yorker Magazine article is pathetic.